Lucky Media Comparison

Statamic vs Hygraph

An honest, side-by-side comparison from a team that has shipped both in production.

Lucky Media Expert Recommendation

For most teams: Statamic

Statamic is Lucky Media's primary CMS and our top recommendation for Laravel teams and content-driven marketing sites. The Control Panel is the best-designed CMS interface in the ecosystem: intuitive enough for non-technical editors on day one, flexible enough for complex content architectures. It runs on Laravel, giving you full PHP framework power when you need it, with a flat-file storage model that eliminates a database dependency for most sites and simplifies deployments, version control, and multi-environment workflows. For teams that want a CMS that grows from a simple marketing site to a full application without changing platforms, Statamic is the answer.

For some teams: Hygraph

Hygraph is a niche but powerful choice for enterprise teams that need to federate content from multiple sources (databases, third-party APIs, and CMS entries) into a single unified GraphQL layer. Its Content Federation capability is the differentiator: rather than migrating data into a central CMS, teams can query Hygraph and receive a unified response assembled from external sources at runtime. This makes it particularly effective for multi-brand or multi-region content operations where data lives in legacy systems that cannot be easily migrated. For most projects that do not require federation, Hygraph's advantages over Sanity or Contentful are less pronounced.

Statamic Verdict

4.8/5

Best For

Laravel shops, marketing sites, and teams that want the speed of flat-file storage with the flexibility of a full framework when they need it

Watch Out

PHP/Laravel ecosystem required, not a fit for Node.js-only shops

ICP Fit Scores

Startup4/5
Scale-up5/5
Enterprise4/5

Hygraph Verdict

3.5/5

Best For

Enterprise teams running multi-brand or multi-region content operations that need federated content queries across heterogeneous data sources

Watch Out

Overkill for most projects; Community tier is limited; full value only realized when Content Federation is actually needed

ICP Fit Scores

Startup2/5
Scale-up3/5
Enterprise5/5

Do you need help choosing the right option?

We help funded startups and enterprises make the right call for their specific team and stack.

Talk to us

Our verdict

Statamic logo
Statamic
Hygraph logo
Hygraph
Overview
Founded20122017
TaglineThe flat-file CMS built for developers, loved by editorsThe federated content graph for enterprise teams
Pricing
Pricing ModelCore free + Pro $275/year + Enterprise (custom)Community free + Scale from $199/mo + Enterprise (custom)
Content Modeling
Flexibility
5/5

Blueprints define schemas in YAML, any field type, nested Replicators, and Bard give complete modeling flexibility.

5/5

GraphQL-native schema with union types and polymorphic relations. Content Federation adds external data sources.

Reusability
4/5

Fieldsets allow reusable field groups across blueprints. Replicators handle block sets.

4/5

Component models embed across content types. Schema-first reuse is straightforward for GraphQL-experienced developers.

Validation
4/5

Blueprints support required, min/max, regex, and custom validation. Custom validators need PHP rules, developer setup.

3/5

Basic required, unique, and regex validators. Advanced custom validation is limited compared to alternatives.

Editor Experience
Onboarding
4/5

The Control Panel is one of the most carefully designed CMS interfaces. Bard and live preview are particularly polished.

3/5

The editor is functional but complex. Editors need to understand GraphQL-style relationships before working efficiently.

Preview
4/5

Live preview via Preview Target config. Not zero-config but straightforward for developers on Laravel projects.

3/5

Preview via configurable URLs. No live preview panel, editors see changes after saving. Developer setup required.

Workflows
4/5

Revisions, scheduling, and workflow states built in. Approval chains need the Collaboration addon on the Pro plan.

4/5

Custom content stages are configurable. Approval workflows with notifications are available on paid plans.

Assets
5/5

Best-in-class for a Laravel CMS, Glide transforms, focal points, alt text, cropping and flexible storage (local, S3, Cloudflare R2, etc).

3/5

Handles uploads and basic transforms via the built-in API. Less capable than alternatives.

Collaboration
Real-time
2/5

No real-time editing. Multi-user access supported but editors can overwrite without live conflict detection.

3/5

Presence indicators show concurrent editors. Live sync available but less polished.

Permissions
4/5

Roles and permissions per collection, nav, and assets. Granular for most teams, field-level access needs custom PHP.

5/5

The most granular here, field, locale, content stage, and model-level access designed for complex enterprise orgs.

Localisation
Localisation
5/5

Multi-site and multi-locale are first-class. Each site has its own locale, content tree, and field-level translations.

5/5

Multi-locale is first-class with field-level variants, locale-specific publishing, and multi-region API delivery.

Fallback
4/5

Locale fallback configurable in the sites config, Statamic falls back to default locale when translation is missing.

5/5

Native fallback configured in project settings with API-level enforcement. GraphQL returns fallback values automatically.

Developer Experience
API Docs
4/5

REST API and GraphQL are well documented. No frontend SDKs are available.

5/5

Excellent GraphQL docs with a live playground, schema introspection, and generated TypeScript types.

SDKs & Integrations
3/5

Primarily PHP/Laravel. No official Next.js or Astro starters.

4/5

Good framework examples. GraphQL-first means any client works easily, less framework tooling than alternatives.

Management API
4/5

Full REST API for content management and direct PHP/Eloquent server-side access. The Stache is programmable via Laravel.

5/5

Full schema management via GraphQL mutations, types, relations, and fields all programmatically creatable.

Environments
3/5

Git-based content means environments are code, branch, test, merge. No CMS env UI but flat files make diffs natural.

4/5

Branch schema and content for testing, then promote. Less polished than DatoCMS's one-click sandbox workflow.

Performance
CDN Delivery
3/5

Self-hosted by default. Flat-file storage eliminates DB queries for most reads, speed depends on hosting.

4/5

Global CDN with multi-region data residency on Enterprise. API performance is strong globally, especially for GraphQL.

Deployment
3/5

Requires PHP/Laravel hosting. More setup than SaaS CMS but simpler than Node.js + DB for teams already on Laravel.

5/5

Fully managed SaaS with zero infrastructure to configure or maintain.

Ecosystem & Longevity
Plugin Ecosystem
4/5

Marketplace has addons for e-commerce, and SEO. Quality is high, stricter review process than npm packages.

3/5

Focused on e-commerce, frameworks, and enterprise tools.

Community
4/5

Tight-knit Discord community with an accessible core team. Fewer developers than some alternatives but high expertise density.

3/5

Enterprise-niche community. Active Discord with responsive support but fewer tutorials and third-party resources.

Final verdict
4.8/53.5/5

Frequently Asked Questions

Statamic vs Hygraph: which is better?

Based on Lucky Media's evaluation, Statamic scores higher overall (4.8/5 vs 3.5/5). Statamic is Lucky Media's primary CMS and our top recommendation for Laravel teams and content-driven marketing sites. The Control Panel is the best-designed CMS interface in the ecosystem: intuitive enough for non-technical editors on day one, flexible enough for complex content architectures. It runs on Laravel, giving you full PHP framework power when you need it, with a flat-file storage model that eliminates a database dependency for most sites and simplifies deployments, version control, and multi-environment workflows. For teams that want a CMS that grows from a simple marketing site to a full application without changing platforms, Statamic is the answer.

When should I choose Statamic?

Statamic is best for: Laravel shops, marketing sites, and teams that want the speed of flat-file storage with the flexibility of a full framework when they need it

When should I choose Hygraph?

Hygraph is best for: Enterprise teams running multi-brand or multi-region content operations that need federated content queries across heterogeneous data sources

Still not sure which to pick?

We help funded startups and enterprises make the right call for their specific team and stack.

Talk to us